 {"id":117,"date":"2010-07-28T18:45:38","date_gmt":"2010-07-28T18:45:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.garfnet.org.uk\/wordpress\/?p=117"},"modified":"2013-11-24T03:04:34","modified_gmt":"2013-11-24T03:04:34","slug":"jailbreaking-iphone-is-legal-common-sense-has-prevailed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/garfnet.org.uk\/wordpress\/2010\/07\/28\/jailbreaking-iphone-is-legal-common-sense-has-prevailed\/","title":{"rendered":"Jailbreaking iPhone is legal &#8211; common sense has prevailed!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Seems that Apple Computer Inc&#8217;s ridiculous claims that <em>Jailbreaking an iPhone breaks the law<\/em> have been firmly rejected by the US Copyright Office and the Library of Congress. Apple attempted to hoodwink the US authorities by alleging that jailbreaking infringed its copyright because the process relies on pirated copies of the bootloader and  operating system. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>However, the decision announced 2010-07-26 by US Librarian of Congress James Billington, specifically adds jailbreaking to the  list of practices that do <strong>not<\/strong> violate the US Digital Millennium Copyright  Act (DMCA).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<em>When one jailbreaks a smartphone in order to make the operating  system on that phone interoperable with an independently created  application that has not been approved by the maker of the smartphone or  the maker of its operating system, the modifications that are made  purely for the purpose of such interoperability are fair uses<\/em>,&#8221; Marybeth  Peters, Register of Copyrights, wrote in the ruling, approved by  Mr Billington.<\/p>\n<p>Ms Peters also rejected Apple&#8217;s 2009 claim that hacking the iPhone violated copyright law because the practice relied on  pirated copies of the smartphone&#8217;s bootloader and operating system. Full story:-<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a title=\"IDG: Apple loses bid to criminalize iPhone jailbreaking\" href=\"http:\/\/news.idg.no\/cw\/art.cfm?id=107913C8-1A64-67EA-E4D2905186EAFF34\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/news.idg.no\/cw\/art.cfm?id=107913C8-1A64-67EA-E4D2905186EAFF34<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Linrary of Congress statement\" href=\"http:\/\/www.copyright.gov\/1201\/2010\/Librarian-of-Congress-1201-Statement.html\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.copyright.gov\/1201\/2010\/Librarian-of-Congress-1201-Statement.html<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Sadly, Apple has made a complete ass of itself with this debacle.  Attempting to force users to use only the\u00c2\u00a0 software that Apple approves  of makes as much sense as Ford telling you that you can only run your  Ford Focus on roads that Ford approves of! Apple&#8217;s public image as a  &#8220;<em>fab &amp; groovy<\/em>&#8221; company that makes elegant, sophisticated products for free-thinking people is now severely and irreparably tarnished. But the news for Apple Computer Inc. is about to get much, much worse. Seems US chain Kmart will be retailing the new Gentiouch (an open source,  Android-powered tablet computer) in the United States for under $150 (US) within the next few  weeks:-<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 401px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" \" title=\"Generic iPad rival for less than $150\" src=\"http:\/\/www.augenus.com\/indexhome.html\/GENTOUCH_files\/shapeimage_12.png\" alt=\"Generic iPad rival for less than $150\" width=\"401\" height=\"290\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Generic iPad rival for less than $150<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>More information:-<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a title=\"Gentouch touchpad information\" href=\"http:\/\/www.augenus.com\/indexhome.html\/GENTOUCH.html \" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.augenus.com\/indexhome.html\/GENTOUCH.html<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Source:-<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a title=\"Slashgear Gentouch article\" href=\"http:\/\/www.slashgear.com\/augen-gentouch-78-149-android-tablet-headed-to-kmart-2795429\/\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.slashgear.com\/augen-gentouch-78-149-android-tablet-headed-to-kmart-2795429\/<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As mentioned in a previous post, it seems the Gentouch is not the only generic touchpad on  its way to a store near you! In addition to those under development in  China, seems other developing nations are entering the fray. According  to BBC News, an Indian company, with the help of the Indian Government  plans to make &amp; market a similar device for twenty five quid (about  35 bucks)!<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/world-south-asia-10740817\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/world-south-asia-10740817<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I  guess the good folks @ Apple Computer Inc. feel they have to &#8220;<em>make hay  while the sun shines<\/em>&#8220;.\u00c2\u00a0 Hence all the misinformation and restrictive practices in its unseemly scramble to fleece the punter for as much cash as possible. And poor  old Steve Jobs is not a well man and no doubt feels his days are  numbered anyway, poor fellow. So you cannot blame Apple for its &#8220;<em>both front-feet in the trough<\/em>&#8221; business strategy I suppose? But I fear Apple&#8217;s current  prosperity will be short lived.<\/p>\n<p>In any event, this is probably not a good time to buy shares in Apple Computer Inc. methinks! lol \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Seems that Apple Computer Inc&#8217;s ridiculous claims that Jailbreaking an iPhone breaks the law have been firmly rejected by the US Copyright Office and the Library of Congress. Apple attempted to hoodwink the US authorities by alleging that jailbreaking infringed its copyright because the process relies on pirated copies of the bootloader and operating system. &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/garfnet.org.uk\/wordpress\/2010\/07\/28\/jailbreaking-iphone-is-legal-common-sense-has-prevailed\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Jailbreaking iPhone is legal &#8211; common sense has prevailed!&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-117","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-weblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/garfnet.org.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/garfnet.org.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/garfnet.org.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/garfnet.org.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/garfnet.org.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=117"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/garfnet.org.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":338,"href":"https:\/\/garfnet.org.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117\/revisions\/338"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/garfnet.org.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/garfnet.org.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/garfnet.org.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}