You are here: Home / Journal / Emulating Tungsten lighting with RGB+CCT

Emulating Tungsten lighting with RGB+CCT

Question appeared on a forum to which I belong with regard to emulating tungsten lighting with RGB+CCT. To find out, I fitted a good old fashioned Philips “Photocrescenta” incandescent bulb and a Mi-Light FUT-105 LED into a double E27 double bulb holder and mounted the assembly on a standard studio boom arm. The Mi-Light FUT 105 is a RGB+CCT (controlled colour temperature) unit with a sturdy die-cast aluminium base that doubles as a heat-sink. In addition to red, green and blue LED’s the FUT-105 and its ilk also have warm white (2700K) and cool white (6500K) LEDs.

Despite their low cost (this 1100 Lumen 12 watt variety set me back just £15 a pop), they can be accurately controlled with a wireless remote or using standard wi-fi and a controller app on a smartphone. There is also an OpenHAB “Thing” module that purports to control it too though I’ve to set that up yet. This is mostly because I am lazy. But also, the Mi-Light/MiBoxer controller software is free, works quite nicely and will independently control 8 sets of lights in an almost unlimited number of zones. I guess there must be a limit but I never reached it! 🙂

The bulbs, comparative close-up. Lit by mix of natural daylight and another Mi-Light FUT-105, set to 5600K.
The bulbs, comparative close-up. Lit by mix of natural daylight and another Mi-Light FUT-105, set to 5600K.

In this experiment, both the bulbs in the photos are running at full power. To make the Mi-Light FUT-105 resemble the incandescent bulb, I set its colour temperature to 3000 Kelvin, no RGB, then took a few snaps. They are also SooC. No editing. I did it by eye, no special measuring kit. The camera white balance was set to “cloudy day” for all three shots, so one can compare the effect reasonably accurately.

Power on, close-up. The Philips 150 Watt incandescent is on the left and the Mi-Light, set to 3000K, is on the right. Both are running at full power.
Power on, close-up. The Philips 150 Watt incandescent is on the left and the Mi-Light, set to 3000K, is on the right. Both are running at full power.
Power on, from a couple of metres away. Again the Mi-Light FUT-105 is on the right.
Power on, from a couple of metres away. Again the Mi-Light FUT-105 is on the right.

 

Screen capture of the Mi-Light controller settings,
Screen capture of the Mi-Light controller settings,

Power

When making comparisons between various technologies or products, I’m becoming increasingly interested by the amount of power things consume. The Philips Photocrescenta incandescent bulb consumed 150 watts and its base had reached 189°C within two minutes. In fact I was worried about it melting the bulb-holder. The Mi-Light FUT-105 RGB+CCT LED bulb consumed 12 watts and its base reached 37°C in the same period of time.

Which is why I don’t use incandescent lighting any more. 🙂

Related Images:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *